Article Options
You Recently Viewed...

SUBSCRIBE TODAY
 
Subscribe

 »  Home  »  Commentaries  »  An all-white Senate?
An all-white Senate?
By Julianne Malveaux | Published  07/8/2010 | Commentaries | Rating:
An all-white Senate?
 
 Julianne Malveaux

There have only been six African-Americans in the United States Senate in history, and two – Hiram Revels and Blanche Bruce – served Mississippi during Reconstruction as appointed Senators.

In modern times, four African Americans – Edward Brooke (1967-79) of Massachusetts, Carol Mosley Braun of Illinois (1993-99), Barack Obama (2005-08) of Illinois, and Roland Burris (2009-10) of Illinois – have served, and each has been the lone African-American Senator serving at that point. Braun, Obama and Burris all held the same seat, with Braun winning it during the “Year of the Woman” in 1992, Obama winning it in 2004 before winning the Presidency in 2008, and Burris now holding it as an appointed Senator who will not run for re-election.

Though former Urban League executive Cheryle Jackson valiantly attempted to succeed Burris, and garnered 21 percent of the vote, there is no African American in the final running for the Illinois Senate seat.

Will the Senate return to its usual lily-white state (it has been segregated longer than it has had an African-American presence) after the 2010 election? That depends on whether Congressman Kendrick Meek (D-Fla.) is able to prevail in his Florida primary on August 24. While former President Bill Clinton and Vice President Joe Biden have held fundraisers for Meek, Meek is not the frontrunner in his primary. Indeed, some say that Meek has garnered insufficient Democratic support and that at the rate the race is going, the state that President Obama won in 2008 may be the site of a Republican victory this year.

Florida Gov. Charlie Crist withdrew from the Republican primary to run as an independent when polls said that former Florida House Speaker Marco Rubio, supposedly a darling of the Tea Party crowd, would whip him in the polls. So Crist started drifting slightly to the left of his formerly solid Republican positions. In drifting left, he has attracted some of the Democratic money that might otherwise have gone to Kendrick Meek. Meanwhile on the Democratic side, billionaire Democrat Jeff Green has decided to challenge Meek for the Democratic nomination. With deep pockets, Green can challenge Meek, but he is unlikely to beat either Crist or Rubio.

If Meek can’t pull this one off, the United States Senate will become, again, a segregated body. So much for post-racial America.

Why aren’t more Democrats embracing the Meek race?  

Money runs with money, and many in the Democratic monied crowd do business with Jeff Green and will support him. How to explain Crist’s inroad into coffers that might have been considered Democratic?  Somebody had better ask the Democrats about that. Crist’s victory in Florida could be a precursor to election results in 2012.

Is it important that an African American serve in the United States Senate?  

One might argue that a good senator is a good senator and that you don’t have to be African American to support important causes such as health care, full employment, education, and other progressive issues as did the late Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.), along with Al Franken (D-Minn.), Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), and Bernard Sanders (D-Vt.) among others.

At the same time, it is bone-chilling that we still have the possibility of segregated legislative bodies in the so-called post racial twenty-first century. Let’s not forget that the United States Senate just voted down an unemployment insurance extension, leaving nearly two million Americans without financial support in the midst of this unemployment crisis. The July 3 employment report suggests that the official unemployment rate has dropped from 9.7 to 9.5 percent for June, but if you dig beneath the headlines, you’ll find that more than 600,000 people dropped out of the labor force, or stopped looking for work.

Had they hung in there the unemployment rate would have risen to 9.9 percent instead of dropping. Last month, the economy generated 125,000 fewer than it had the month before, and 25.8 million Americans were either employed or underemployed.  Nearly half – 45 percent – had not held jobs in 6 months.  But the United States Senate, citing fiscal responsibility, refused to extend unemployment insurance for them.

Who will better understand the plight of the unemployed, Kendrick Meek, Jeff Green, Charlie Crist or Marco Rubio? A review of their records suggests that Meek will bring a passion to serve the underserved to the rather patrician and otherwise all-white Senate.

If the Democratic Party does not fully embrace the candidacy of Meek, they may choose to lose Florida in the 2012 Presidential election. With just six weeks away from the August 24 primary, the Dems can’t afford inaction or inertia. A decision made three weeks from now may be too little, too late.  

Are we about to experience a blast from the past, an all-white United States Senate?

(NNPA columnist and economist Julianne Malveaux is president of Bennett College for Women and also President of the PUSH/Excel Board of Directors.)

How would you rate the quality of this article?
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Excellent

Verification:
Enter the security code shown below:
imgRegenerate Image


Add comment
Related Articles
Comments
  • Comment #1 (Posted by Malcom)
    Rating
    Thank you for putting our people back in a box. You are a disappointment.
     
  • Comment #2 (Posted by Tom)
    Rating
    All white is not the same as segregated. Is the Black Caucus in the house "segregated"?
     
  • Comment #3 (Posted by Trevor)
    Rating
    Although I support your argument in this article, your use of the term "segregated" to describe the Senate is incorrect. For the Senate to be truly segregated, there would have to actually be black senators in this deliberative body, who would then be set apart from the white senators. If all that remains in the Senate after November are white people, then a better term might be "discriminatory," since the voters themselves, rather than the policies and rules of the Senate, chose not to elect African-Americans to represent them.
     
  • Comment #4 (Posted by Keith)
    Rating
    Tom, and the other uninformed brothers, the reason we have the Black Caucus is because, our numbers and representation in the House and Senate is so small, that we have to unite on some cause. The Republicans do it all the time, the just don't call themselves the White Caucasus, it is what it is. The Senate is the political Good Ole Boys network / country club.
    We are 12 percent of the population by 2050 this country will be 50 percent non white. I wont be around but I feel safe in saying that the Senate will be the same
     
  • Comment #5 (Posted by David)
    Rating
    "One might argue that a good senator is a good senator and that you don’t have to be African American to support important causes such as health care, full employment, education, and other progressive issues as did the late Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.), along with Al Franken (D-Minn.), Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), and Bernard Sanders (D-Vt.) among others."

    Umm..YOU might argue this. What does ethnicity have to do with anything when all you want is a liberal Senator? You have your "rising star" Alvin Greene, get behind him..Reality is that not all blacks are leftist. I persnoally would rather have no blacks in the Senate rather than another one representing the liberal issues.

     
  • Comment #6 (Posted by bill)
    Rating
    Sour Grapes
     
  • Comment #7 (Posted by Adam_ME)
    Rating
    An all-white Senate? What happens if Rubio wins? Do Latinos not count as minorities anymore? Or do we not count him because he's a conservative Republican? Sadly, that last question would probably be answered "yes" by the most of the left-wing media.
     
  • Comment #8 (Posted by lorien1973)
    Rating
    What, no Alvin Greene? He's the democrat nominee and he's black as well.

    Also, is it really post racial to say that you are only post racial if you vote for a black candidate?

    I don't think Rubio is white, though. There are also, I believe, 2 asians in the senate. Let's not forget Roland Burris, too.
     
  • Comment #9 (Posted by Heywood U Buzzoff)
    Rating
    There are no 7 foot tall people in the Senate so the Democrats must support any 7 foot tall people who run for the Senate or it will be segregated by height. I love how 'post racial' supports are quick to toss the race card and claim that is the reason why a Kendrick meek is losing and not Kendrick Meek or his actions in the Senate.
     
  • Comment #10 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    Simple Miss Malveaux, support Michael Williams to replace Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison in 2012. Your problem will be solved. http://www.williamsfortexas.com .
     
  • Comment #11 (Posted by MacolmXY)
    Rating
    Julianne Malveaux, you might look in the mirror before you start complaining about anybody looking too white.
     
  • Comment #12 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    Pathetic - I know you haven't forgotten that Rubio is not white. Why write the article. Why is was there not the same disappointment when black Republican Michael Williams lost in the primary in the Texas Senate seat. Seems to me this is purely ideological masked as some type of racial injustice (albeit a sorry attempt at that). I repeat - pathetic.
     
  • Comment #13 (Posted by MacolmXY)
    Rating
    That should be "anybody or any body"

    The comment function on this website is culturally biased against me.
     
  • Comment #14 (Posted by PD Quig)
    Rating
    This is an equal opportunity society, not an equal outcome one. Maybe when 60 percent of black students aren't dropping out of school because it is uncool to be a good student, the population of successful blacks will result in more balanced representation.
     
  • Comment #15 (Posted by Nick Danger)
    Rating
    So, Ms. Malveaux, whatever happened to "content of character, not color of skin" when evaluating that candidate?

    It's unfortunate so many African-Americans have attached themselves to the party of institutional racism, to wit, The Democrat Party, but it appears a majority have drunk the kool-aid

    Supporting the party of Andrew Jackson, institutional slavery, the party of an all white civil service Woodrow Wilson, the party of Jim Crow, the party of the Great Society plan to dissolve the African-American family?

    Are you fools or just not very good at history?
     
  • Comment #16 (Posted by Andrew)
    Rating
    This is one of the dumbest things that I've ever read in my entire life. So what if the Senate is all white? What difference does that make? Is someone's vote better because of their skin color? Leave it to leftists to do their racial bean counting on the op-ed pages. This is a joke. Think about all the dopey-ass people in the CBC. Maxine Waters? She's the biggest moron in America. Charlie Rangel? One of America's biggest scumrags. What if there were a congressional white caucus?
     
  • Comment #17 (Posted by Johnny Smith)
    Rating
    Why are you such a racist?

    Why are you so narrow minded, that color of skin is the most important issue for you?
     
  • Comment #18 (Posted by Holger)
    Rating
    So I guess Marco Rubio isn't the parents of Cuban Exiles. Wait, maybe that isn't why he is counted as a minority?

    Post-Racial is Orwellian language. It means Post-Capitalism.
     
  • Comment #19 (Posted by dIb)
    Rating
    Who wrote this?

    “I hope his wife feeds him lots of eggs and butter and he dies early like many black men do, of heart disease….He is an absolutely reprehensible person.”
     
  • Comment #20 (Posted by J)
    Rating
    Why does everything need to be about race? Here we have an article that is complaining about race and how legislative bodies throughout the United States aren't "post-racial." I have a fantastic idea to jump start this "post-racial-era": stop talking about race. And you can start right here on this website.

    For many (i.e. a majority) people, the color of one's skin has nothing to do with how many votes a candidate receives. It's all about principles.

    The stupidity of this regurgitated argument is simply astounding.
     
  • Comment #21 (Posted by getfitnow)
    Rating
    Since your concern seems to be "color", black specifically, how about a shout out to Alvin Greene of South Carolina?
     
  • Comment #22 (Posted by Bill Hubbard)
    Rating
    I live in Florida, and Meek would finish 4th or 5th if all candidates ran in one primary. I think the premise of this article is clearly incorrect. It's not segregation to reject an inferior candidate (Meek). It has nothing to do with the color of his skin, but rather his politics. Also, in Florida, the President has made it difficult for any candidate with a D behind his name to gather support.
     
  • Comment #23 (Posted by Jake)
    Rating
    To show how intellectually dishonest this is, notice how this article simply focuses on Black DEMOCRAT Senate candidates. Like the skies will fall, the mountains will tumble, cat's and dogs will start living together if a Black DEMOCRAT isn't elected. Nevermind whether that candidate may or may not be qualified, apparently just having a D after their name makes them the only hope.

    There are THREE Black REPUBLICANS running for the Senate this year; Larry Linney (North Carolina), Marion Thorpe (Florida), Michael Williams (Texas). But they'd don't count, do they? Because they have a R after their names.

    http://blackpoliticalthought.blogspot.com/2010/04/list-of-black-republican-candidates-in.html
     
  • Comment #24 (Posted by denny)
    Rating
    waaaaa! waaaaa! waaaaa! always whitey's fault when blacks don't succeed! or, when blacks don't even try! Why ain't YOU out making black senators?
     
  • Comment #25 (Posted by Tim)
    Rating
    When you put up great candidates like Alvin Greene, what do you expect.

    Also, to steal a line from the Princess Bride, concerning segregation, I don't think that word means what you think it means.

    There is no law stopping blacks, african amercans, afro americans, or whatever the acceptable nomenclature is today, from running for the Senate. Heck, Michael Steele ran back in 2004 as did Obama. No one stopped them from running.

    So what if every senator is white, or every senator is black? What difference does it make? Does a white senator not represent the black consitutients of their state? Or does a black senator not represent their white constituents?

    Maybe you should fault more African Americans for not running for senate. I believe 32 African Americans ran for office in the Republican party this year. And it appears South Carolina is going to have its first black representative this November, running as a republican.

    I think more African Americans will be running in the Republican party in the future, the question is, will you support them? Or are you just interested in are blacks only acceptable when they run as democrats?
     
  • Comment #26 (Posted by francine)
    Rating
    For my money, it's Alvin Greene all the way.
     
  • Comment #27 (Posted by Brian)
    Rating
    A joke of an editorial. One the one hand bemoaning the passing of the dream of "post-racial" America, while, in the same breath, encouraging people to vote for the black man because...wait for it...of his skin color. Right on cue, Malveaux gives voice to the trite statement that Meek will, of course, be more concerned for the plight of the downtrodden, but it is clear from the article that this is because she sees him as the necessary black counterbalance to a lily-white Senate. More evidence that the ones who will complain the most about a truly "post-racial" America will be activist members of minority constituencies who milk victimhood endlessly. I also noted that there was no mention AT ALL of Rubio's status as a Cuban (get it, Latino, a minority) American who most certainly is doing quite well without going for the pity vote. But, again very predictably, his status as a conservative Republican apparently indicates he is not a "true" minority in the eyes of Malveaux.
     
  • Comment #28 (Posted by Calvin)
    Rating
    You fat, ugly, buck-toothed ignoramous; maybe you should just form your own segregated congress that will only govern blacks, happy then?
     
  • Comment #29 (Posted by John Steele)
    Rating
    So let me guess this straight --- if we don't just elect blacks regardless of their political views, accomplishments, etc., we are simply racists?

    Talks about RACIST, this is the most racist proposition I've ever heard. With people like you on their side blacks in America don't need enemies.
     
  • Comment #30 (Posted by smfic)
    Rating
    Rubio's got an R next to his name, so he doesn't count in the post-racial America. The only minorities that pass muster are those that agree with idiot Jeremiah Wright or the even more idiotic new black panther party.
     
  • Comment #31 (Posted by White Cracker)
    Rating
    I guess this crap cannot be labeled as racist. How about ignorant, ill-informed, and pathetic. I truly feel sadness for someone who, in the greatest nation the world has ever known, is simply too blind to realize how fortunate she is to have been born in this country. Sadly, we have a President who is also devoid of reality and intent on making the "shining beacon on the hill" something less...much less.
     
  • Comment #32 (Posted by IntheKNOW)
    Rating
    This article is a slanted liberal progressive view. Most of americans do NOT care about the color of the skin for the Senators. They care about their agenda and do not whine if they cannot get elected because that is how our republic works according to the constitution. Requiring minorities is against the law in this land as it should be, although there are required numbers for minorities in numerous cases in the obamacare bill that is illegal. Also, the financial bill has instances of minority requirements.
     
  • Comment #33 (Posted by ta)
    Rating
    Just another racist African American "journalist" from the left who chooses to see everything through the distorted prism of race in an attempt to shame people into submission.

    Hey darlin, if you want to see who is responsible for racism these days, and why the Senate is so "segregated" - like your world view - TAKE A GOOD LOOK IN THE MIRROR
     
  • Comment #34 (Posted by ta)
    Rating
    Just another racist African American "journalist" from the left who chooses to see everything through the distorted prism of race in an attempt to shame people into submission.

    Hey darlin, if you want to see who is responsible for racism these days, and why the Senate is so "segregated" - like your world view - TAKE A GOOD LOOK IN THE MIRROR
     
  • Comment #35 (Posted by Jackie)
    Rating
    Does the author define "diversity" as black and white only? Reading the article, it seems that way. It is ironic that she thinks Florida MUST elect a black person to avoid a "lily-white" Senate, when in fact, Rubio is a descendant from Cubans, who are, history tells us, not necessarily Caucasians. Other senators, with diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds, such as Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Daniel Akaka (D-Hawaii), Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii), Olympia Snowe (R-Maine), and George Voinovich (R-Ohio) would be fascinated to know that they are "lily-white," as would many other senators with varied ethnic backgrounds. Is it right to play the race card only when it applies to a particular race?
     
  • Comment #36 (Posted by Will)
    Rating
    This is such a terrible argument, I agree with Lorien, how on earth is trying to fulfill a quota post racial?

    Seriously support Michael Williams for Texas Senate in 2012, that should fulfill your quota.

    Although technically we should have 75 Whites (6 of which identify as Hispanic), 12 Blacks, 8 Non-white Hispanics, 5 asians, and 2 biracial, and 5 of another race, and equal parts men and women,

    as well as 40% of those who identify as conservative, 36% should identify as moderate, and 21% identify as liberal. 30% should be tea party supporters, and 58% should have voted for Ronald Reagan.


    This is obviously impossible, and as the majority of people in each state electing senators are white, (and yes people vote on skin color, look at the 96% of blacks who voted for Obama), it is quite obvious that those above statistics will never be the case in the senate, and calling America racist because of it is just absurd. The reason is, I imagine, quite similar to why the electoral vote is not always identical to the popular vote.
     
  • Comment #37 (Posted by TexJim)
    Rating
    I agree with her; any Black Floridian who votes for anyone but Meeks, no matter how many times, is an Uncle Tom!
     
  • Comment #38 (Posted by Charlie)
    Rating
    Keith, you bring up a good point that Ms Malveaux, in an otherwise well-reasoned piece, completely misses. As long as blacks in the House focus on minority issues, they will make it awfully difficult for blacks to be elected to Senate seats, where, after all, one must appeal to majoritarian interests across a large geographic range. Gerrymandered, racially-secure House districts will continue to cost blacks a chance in the Senate as black politicians continue both in appearance and job experience to be focused on their own narrow interests.
     
  • Comment #39 (Posted by robert-fl)
    Rating
    Wow! Judging by this absurd article and some of the racist comments here, the black racists certainly feel empowered by obama and holder. Keep it up, folks. Show the country who you really are. The MAJORITY are fed up with you, and some things are going to change come election time.
     
  • Comment #40 (Posted by Douglas)
    Rating
    Black caucus segregated? NOT
    NAACP have a white counterpart? NOT
    Blacks have and continue to segregate themselves more than any group I have ever experienced. Knock it off. Call yourself and American, and stand on your own feet.
     
  • Comment #41 (Posted by Carl)
    Rating
    Well, after seeing how the "first" black president is doing as well as the other black members of Congress, maybe it's a good thing except there are so many white idiots as well.
     
  • Comment #42 (Posted by Jesse Jackson)
    Rating
    RAAAACCIISST!!!!!
     
  • Comment #43 (Posted by Nick Danger)
    Rating
    Carl,

    I don't think it's the skin color of the President or the Democrat members of Congress that is the "problem". The real problem is the strong arm thug tactics and, well, the communist nature of the Democrat Party as it is currently constituted.

    They are governing against the will of the people and will reap the whirlwind on November 2, 2010.

    Then President Obama will be the loneliest communist in DC.
     
  • Comment #44 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    none
     
  • Comment #45 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    Democrats routinely reject black candidates. Look at Lynn Swann in the PA governor's race in 06. (well, come to think of it, he was a Republican so that probably didn't count. Can't vote for an Uncle Tom race traitor.) And then there is Artur Davis who lost to that dimwit Ron Sparks in the AL gov primary. So, Dems vote against blacks all the time. Doesn't mean they're racist or segregationists. But then again...the Klan was founded by Democrats. Democrats have historically voted against Civil Rights including that cracker Robert Byrd who filibustered the 1964 Voting Rights Act. And then of course every single villain of the Civil Rights era was a Democrat. Hmmmm, maybe Democrats are all racists.
     
  • Comment #46 (Posted by nigel)
    Rating
    What a nasty, borderline offensive woman this is. Terms like "lily-white" and "segregated body" are really incendiary. No one is stopping a black man from being elected, why, she even points out that Clinton and Biden raised money for Meeks. Maybe he is a poor candidate. Maybe people are beginning to realise that they shouldn't vote for a candidate for the racial feel-good thing. If she wants to talk about post racial America, let's bring up Eric Holder.
     
  • Comment #47 (Posted by Davecat84)
    Rating
    Quotas?
     
  • Comment #48 (Posted by Lance)
    Rating
    The only people hung up on race are Democrats, they like crying over spilled milk...for years. No use crying over it... Who gives a hoot if there are no blacks in the Senate. Can we base something on merit instead of skin color please?

    Maybe if our economy was based on real industries instead of services, we would not be hurting so bad. So, you should ask, what candidate is better for fostering new business...the answer...not Meeks.
     
  • Comment #49 (Posted by BobL)
    Rating
    Why is it I am rightfully expected (as a person of non-color) not to care about a persons color but it seems to be the sole focus of people like the author of this message. I am interested in knowing if Meek was a conservative Republican, would his being black still make him better able to "understand" the challenges faced by folks on a day to day basis. This article is not over about an all-white senate as much as it is about concerns with a more conservative senate. The author needs to come off campus and deal in the real world.
     
  • Comment #50 (Posted by CT Rubicon)
    Rating
    Mosely braun, obama and burris the recent black senators. How funny. Every single one of them is corrupt (braun criminal case, obama and his rezco sweetheart house deal, burris trying to buy a senate seat) lying, crook. Maybe that is why there arent more blacks in the US Senate? Just a thought. I am sure that makes me racist in your eyes.
     
  • Comment #51 (Posted by Jim B)
    Rating
    Julianne is herself obviously a racist and a segregationist since she didn't support the runs of Alan Keyes or Michael Steele when they ran for office.

    Since the only thing she can see is skin color, then where is her column supporting the Democratic candidate for Senate in South Carolina?

    This is the most bigoted, pro-discrimination, anti-MLK column written today.

    Good for her for not being afraid to show just what an ignorant throwback to a previous era she is. It took a lot of guts to put all that ignorance on display in just one short column.
     
  • Comment #52 (Posted by Kary)
    Rating
    Your "lily" comments are as offensive as if I used "nappy haired" about you. It is NOT important to have blacks in the Senate. I would support that as soon as the Black Caucus accepts a white. You look at the world through "black glasses" - that is why you will always be on the bottom
     
  • Comment #53 (Posted by phil)
    Rating
    Instead of lamenting a loser 'progressive' like Meeks' failure, have Condi Rice or some other intelligent candidate run for senate. Thankfully we have Clarence Thomas on the Supreme Court.
     
  • Comment #54 (Posted by Alan Davidson)
    Rating
    I would bet my very life that this reporter would not be writing this article is Meeks were a Republican.

    Did she mention Steele's past run in this article or write an article when he was running for senate? NO.

    Did she write an article about how he was smeared by the Schumer thugs who accessed his credit report illegally? NO.

    Did she mention THREE other black candidates running for a senate seat in 2010, namely:

    Marion Thorpe, Florida

    Larry Linney, North Carolina

    Michael Williams, Texas

    NO, NO & NO! Why...because they are REPUBLICANS.

    She is a hack writer and this has NOTHING to do with Meek being black. Is has to do with him being a black DEMOCRAT. She cares not about race.

    She is an partisan ideologue!
     
  • Comment #55 (Posted by Karen)
    Rating
    Michelle,

    The real problem for blacks in politics and this country is the utter disaster that is President Obama. The first black man to occupy the most powerful position in the world has done more damage to the future of blacks. Sadly, blacks still support him in staggering numbers merely because they and he are black.

    Until being black stops being the most important issue to blacks and they start caring about the economy, the deficits, the health care rationing that will affect them and the future of this country and pick leaders who will do the right thing regardless of race, they get no sympathy and are losing my respect for claiming they are not treated equally when they are most guilty of voting for a candidates' skin color rather than his policies.


     
  • Comment #56 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    rbpm0v
     
  • Comment #57 (Posted by Seriously)
    Rating
    Come on. The culture of convenient, selective outrage is reedonkulous among certain people. If this lady also wrote an article about the New Black Panther Party people and the rioting going down in Oakland right now targeted at all non-black owned stores and how these are indications that we do not live in a post-racial America, it would be a lot easier to read this article without laughing it off.
     
  • Comment #58 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    If we are to do racial bean counting, Rubio is Cuban or does that not count? Are people really only capable of representing others who only look like them? Post-racial would seem to mean the opposite of what you are stating it to mean.
     
  • Comment #59 (Posted by Glen Meyers)
    Rating
    Maybe she and those racebaiters like her could support Alan West and Hector Maldonado, both people of color running for the Republican party. Oh! thats right the Republican party is only old white males. If they want peopl-e of color voted in they should support these Republicans or are people like Jullianne hypocrites?
     
  • Comment #60 (Posted by ChiliT)
    Rating
    Maybe no one is supporting Meeks because he is an idiot.
     
  • Comment #61 (Posted by Mugwa)
    Rating
    Yes, an all white senate. You guys had your chance and you backed a bannana repub dictator that is destroying this country and nmaking the DOJ racist as all get out. so, toodles!!
     
  • Comment #62 (Posted by George)
    Rating
    she is PARANOID
     
  • Comment #63 (Posted by dfgh)
    Rating
    Comment #19 (Posted by dIb)

    >>>Who wrote this?
    “I hope his wife feeds him lots of eggs and butter and he dies early like many black men do, of heart disease….He is an absolutely reprehensible person.”<<<

    I'm gonna say that a disgusting POS called "Julianne Malveaux" said that vile, racist thing about the Great Justice Clarence Thomas.

     
  • Comment #64 (Posted by MetRo)
    Rating
    This is another perfect example of the liberal argument of racism. If you're white and conservative you must be racist, yet you vomit these words to the public about a segregated Senate and that's not racist? Wake up and see how these sentiments against whites are the same you accuse us of! More liberal propaganda and basing all your arguments on social in-justice. You mam are exactly whats wrong with this country and the liberal media engine that continues to erode everything the Founding Fathers gave to us. You smell of racism yet you are so comfortable with it you are unaware of the putrid odor!
     
  • Comment #65 (Posted by Steve007)
    Rating
    Really,how can anyone disagree that this is a strongly racist column? With President Dither's election, no one can rationally claim that America is anything but an egalitarian nation...even if not too bright.
     
  • Comment #66 (Posted by Seth)
    Rating
    "Are we about to experience a blast from the past, an all-white United States Senate?"

    OUR PRESIDENT IS BLACK!!!!!!!

    "Who will better understand the plight of the unemployed?"

    Are you saying that only the black candidate will understand what people who don't have jobs are going through? Kendrick Meek isn't unemployed, but he is black, so is that the connection you're making?

    Julianne, sooner or later, the race card will be denied.

     
  • Comment #67 (Posted by DarkStar)
    Rating
    Wow - how racially insensitive. Three points:

    One: Given the past performance of African-American Senators, it doesn't look good. Braun was (still is) a total racist idiot, Obama went only to vote "present" and run for president, Burris is a doddering old man holding the seat because Obama/Rahm Emmanual almost got busted trying to appoint Valerie Jarrett. African-Americans are 0 for 3 on these last three that COULD get elected.

    Two: Segregated means by law. Run someone besides an empty suit and they might win.

    Three: In the interst of fairness, let's set aside TWELVE senate seats for African-Americans (their current percentage of the population) and in return, we'll restrict African-Americans to 12% of the roster spots on NBA and NFL teams. It will be boring as hell to watch, but much more DIVERSE!

    Oops, I forgot, diverse means African-Americans get what they want, not a true cross-section of society.

    Julianne, you're truly a racist dope.
     
  • Comment #68 (Posted by Jane)
    Rating
    How is it the senate's fault that few black people even campaign to be a senator? Look, just because he's black, it doesn't mean Meeks is automatically a good candidate. It's no less racist than those who prefer to only vote for white candidates.
     
  • Comment #69 (Posted by Bill)
    Rating
    "In modern times, four African Americans – Edward Brooke (1967-79) of Massachusetts, Carol Mosley Braun of Illinois (1993-99), Barack Obama (2005-08) of Illinois, and Roland Burris (2009-10) of Illinois – have served, and each has been the lone African-American Senator serving at that point"

    3 crooks and a Brooke
     
  • Comment #70 (Posted by Ken)
    Rating
    "Who will better understand the plight of the unemployed, Kendrick Meek, Jeff Green, Charlie Crist or Marco Rubio?"
    Hmmm. Meeks inherited his seat from his mother, Carrie Meeks. How does that equate to understanding anything except nepotism and privledge? When liberals see people as anything other than members of constituent groups, perhaps we can move towards a post-racial society. Unfortunatly, the Dems only hope for the future is tied to keeping us divided.
     
  • Comment #71 (Posted by Al Sharpton's Daddy)
    Rating
    Hey you ignorant racist. Maybe you should educate yourself before spewing such lies and hate.

    Nearly 40 African-Americans ran for the U.S. House or Senate as Republicans this year, according to the Frederick Douglass Foundation, a black Republican group. Eight black hopefuls have secured the GOP nomination in primaries, and several more are in the running in states where primaries haven't yet been held.
    Notable was the choice this week in a predominantly white congressional district in South Carolina of Tim Scott, a 44-year-old African-American, over the son of former U.S. Sen. Strom Thurmond—a figure who once symbolized segregation in the Deep South.

    saac Hayes, the GOP nominee seeking to knock out U.S. Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr., who has represented the 2nd District of Illinois for 15 years, is a youth minister at Chicago's 20,000-member Apostolic Church of God—where President Barack Obama delivered a 2008 Father's Day speech.

    Other black Republican nominees considered viable in the November general election include Stephen Broden, a Dallas pastor running in the 30th District of Texas and Michael Faulkner, a former NFL player and pastor running in the 15th District of New York.

    You also failed to mention how the DEMOCRATS at the Chicago Democrat Machine reached into neighboring Will County and lined up a couple Democrat officials to throw Cedra Crenshaw, GOP candidate for the 43rd State Senate District, off the ballot. They preferred to go with the WHITE Democrat over the BLACK REPUBLICAN.

    Never let the facts get in the way of your race bating right?
     
  • Comment #72 (Posted by halfbaked)
    Rating
    Um, having no black Senator versus one is not a blast from the past.

    The fact that one black senator is seen as progress at all is a joke. The senate is a failed governing body and the fact that blacks can't gain access to it is more proof of that.

    Our country is seriously backpedaling, but whether there's one or zero black senators isn't an indicator of anything other than how sad it is that blacks can't gain representation in Congress after all this time.

    We should be ashamed of ourselves.
     
  • Comment #73 (Posted by jgalt)
    Rating
    another racist liberal article, yawn. some segregated groups that come to mind are la raza, new black panther party, and the black caucus. the republicans have numerous female and black candidates, whats the problem with you liberals?
     
  • Comment #74 (Posted by Frosty)
    Rating
    What happened to the "content of their character, not the color of their skin" concept? There is little doubt that if Meek was a strong candidate, supporting issues that the majority of Dems could go for, along with a few independents, he would be the candidate and have a decent chance in a 3-way race. Ms. Malveaux, surely you can't be this blinded by the race factor.
     
  • Comment #75 (Posted by Dave )
    Rating
    This is why I only date White women!
     
  • Comment #76 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    The problem with the Senate is that it has too many Jews despite the fact they are only two percent of the population.
     
  • Comment #77 (Posted by Richard Terrell)
    Rating
    This is just inane and silly. Who really cares that it's an all white Senate. We have a half-black president who is doing his best to take us all to the poor house so the "misery" can be shared by all.
     
  • Comment #78 (Posted by DaeQuan)
    Rating
    Do your homework. Alvin Greene in South Carolina is black. He may be a joke, but he's the Democratic nominee.
     
  • Comment #79 (Posted by Bilbo Baggins)
    Rating
    Segregated? Blacks are prevented from serving in the senate? Hardly. This article is silly.
     
  • Comment #80 (Posted by Buckwheat)
    Rating

    WHO SAID THE FOLLOWING?

    1.After proclamations by the North Carolina Attorney General, Roy Cooper, that the three students who were victims of false accusations during the 2006 Duke University lacrosse case were "innocent" in April, this person commented in an interview on National Public Radio a few days later that they were "hooligans," had lied, and that they "did not deserve an apology.

    2.On the November 4, 1994 episode of the PBS talk show, To the Contrary, this person summed up her feelings regarding Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas: "The man is on the Court. You know, I hope his wife feeds him lots of eggs and butter and he dies early, like many black men do, of heart disease. Well, that’s how I feel. He is an absolutely reprehensible person.

    3.Five years later, the conservative Media Research Center singled out this person for recognition, of sorts, bestowing on her one of its "Dishonor Awards for the Decade's Most Outrageous Liberal Bias", with Justice Thomas accepting the award "on behalf of" Malveaux in her absence.

    4.Of course, Mr. Hannity was outraged that any American would not cross her hand over her heart and repeat the hypocritical words, “one nation.” Whenever we come up on the Fourth of You Lie, I think of Frederick Douglas and his masterful oration, “The meaning of the Fourth of July to the Negro.” Pledge the flag? I think not!

    Was it

    A. Some WHITE person
    B. Julianne Malveaux
    C. Mickey Mouse
    D. Elmer Fudd

    If you picked B, you have a brain.


     
  • Comment #81 (Posted by Joel)
    Rating
    Wow, another black person calling everyone who doesn't elect all black people to office as racist.

    Hey, I woke up white this morning--oh no, I'm racist!!

    Newsflash to those not paying close attention: We now have a black president. Every 10 minutes there's another black congressperson standing up to view the black present (oops, I mean president) uncritically and with eyes closed to reality---reality is inconsequential. Only that everyone accept all the terms of surrender of our voting rights and vote BLACK in all elections.

    Otherwise, you are a racist, end of story.

    Well, good luck pitching that story to normal American folks. You'll have exactly as much luck as your idiot leader in Washington.
     
  • Comment #82 (Posted by maryo)
    Rating
    In post-racial America, we don't look at the color of one's skin. If Meek's only qualification is that his skin is black, he has no qualification to be a Senator.
     
  • Comment #83 (Posted by wukong)
    Rating
    It would appear as if Julianne has selective amnesia as both Senators from Hawaii are not caucasian and Marco Rubio can probably check those vaunted identity boxes on government documents.
     
  • Comment #84 (Posted by JPK)
    Rating
    Maybe its not the color but the quality of the Senate.
     
  • Comment #85 (Posted by Alex Trebek)
    Rating
    Quotes From Today's Civil Rights Movement- because you KNOW only Whitey is racist.

    I am going to be like a pit bull. That is the way I'm going to be against the Jews. I am going to bite the tail of the honkies. -- Khalid Abdul Muhammad, Nation Of Islam & New Black Panther Party, at Howard University, 1994

    The Jews don't like Farrakhan, so they call me Hitler. Well, that's a good name. Hitler was a very great man. He rose Germany up from the ashes -- Louis Farrakhan, 1984

    Now that nation called Israel, never has had any peace in forty years and she will never have any peace because there can never be any peace structured on injustice, thievery, lying and deceit and using the name of God to shield your dirty religion under His holy and righteous name -- Louis Farrakhan, 1984

    'Hymies.' 'Hymietown.' -- Jesse Jackson's description of New York City while on the 1984 presidential campaign trail.

    You see everybody always talk about Hitler exterminating six million Jews. That's right. But don't nobody ever ask what did they do to Hitler...They went in there, in Germany, the way they do everywhere they go, and they supplanted, they usurped...they had undermined the very fabric of the society. -- Khalid Abdul Muhammad, Nation Of Islam & New Black Panther Party, Chicago Sun-Times, Appearance at Chicago State University, March 24, 1996

    I say to Jewish America: Get ready...knuckle up, put your boots on, because we're ready and the war is going down... The real deal is this: Black youth do not want a relationship with the Jewish community or the mainstream white community or the foot shuffling, head-bowing, knee bobbing black community... All you Jews can go straight to hell. -- Quannell X, National Youth minister for the Nation Of Islam, New York Daily News, October 17, 1995

    On the Bush administration) Instead of uniting us the new administration almost daily separates and divides. They selected nominees from the Taliban wing of American politics, appeased the wretched appetites of the extreme right wing and chose Cabinet officials whose devotion to the Confederacy is nearly canine in its uncritical affection -- Julian Bond

    There is a right-wing conspiracy...an interlocking network of funders, groups, and activists, who coordinate their methods and their message...They are...the movement behind vouchers, the legal assault on affirmative action and other remedies for discrimination, attempts to reapportion us [blacks] out of office, and attacks on equity everywhere. They’ve had a collection of black hustlers and hucksters on their payrolls for more than twenty years, promoting them as the new generation of black leaders. They can’t deal with the leaders we choose for ourselves, so they manufacture, promote, and hire new ones. Like ventriloquists’ dummies, [these blacks] speak in their puppet-master’s voice -- Julian Bond at the 2002 NAACP Convention

    (On Black Conservatives) A new breed of Uncle Tom [and] some of the biggest liars the world ever saw - Former NAACP executive director Benjamin Hooks on black Conservatives

    Anthrax did not come from a cave in Afghanistan," but from "[t]he same people who blew up the building in Oklahoma City, Ruby Ridge, the terror attack in Atlanta, Georgia - those same anti-union forces....'Ashcroft is using the FBI as one weapon, the IRS as another weapon, and leaks to the right-wing media as another weapon' to 'destroy the leadership' of organized labor. -- Jesse Jackson at speech to AFL-CIO in Dec, 2001

    In South Africa we'd call it Apartheid. In Nazi Germany we'd call it fascism. Here we call it conservatism. These people are attacking the poor -- Jesse Jackson

    When white folks can’t defeat you, they’ll always find some Negro, some boot-licking, butt-licking, bamboozled, half-baked, half-fried, sissified, punkified, pasteurized, homogenized N*gger that they can trot out in front of you -- Khalid Abdul Muhammad of the Nation Of Islam

    The President wants to talk about a terrorist named bin Laden. I don't want to talk about bin Laden. I want to talk about a terrorist called Christopher Columbus. I want to talk about a terrorist called George Washington. I want to talk about a terrorist called Rudy Giuliani. The real terrorists have always been the United Snakes of America. -- Malik Zulu Shabazz at reparations rally, 2002

    I want to go up to the closest white person and say: 'You can't understand this, it's a black thing' and then slap him, just for my mental health -- Charles Barron, a New York city councilman at a reparations rally, 2002

    If they don't pay us reparations now, we're talking about scorched earth -- Charles Barron, a New York city councilman at a reparations rally, 2002

    Reparations are a really good way for white people to admit they're wrong -- Zack Webb, University Of Kentucky NAACP

    apologize. Exactly three years ago, we ran a cover illustration of U. S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, resplendent with an Aunt Jemima-like handkerchief on his head. In retrospect, we were far too benevolent. Hence, this month’s cover with Clarence appropriately attired as a lawn jockey. Even our latest depiction is too compassionate for a person who has done so much to turn back the clock on civil rights...During slavery, the lawn jockeys on plantations were used to let other owners know when a slave had escaped. According to slave narrative, a lantern would be placed in the jockey’s hand and would remain there as long as the escaped slave remained free. Now you know why there’s a lantern in Clarence’s hand on our cover. That’s Clarence Thomas--he’ll leave a light on for you. -- Emerge Magazine, 1996

    A handkerchief-head, chicken-and-biscuit-eating Uncle Tom -- Spike Lee

    I have told [Thomas] I am ashamed of him, because he is becoming to the black community what Benedict Arnold was to the nation he deserted; and what Judas Iscariot was to Jesus: a traitor; and what Brutus was to Caesar: an assassin -- Reverend Joseph Lowery of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference

    ivil rights laws were not passed to protect the rights of white men and do not apply to them -- Mary Frances Berry, Chairman, US Commission on Civil Rights

    The white man is our mortal enemy, and we cannot accept him. I will fight to see that vicious beast go down into the late of fire prepared for him from the beginning, that he never rise again to give any innocent black man, woman or child the hell that he has delighted in pouring on us for 400 years -- Louis Farrakhan, City College audience in New York

    I mean, if black people kill black people every day, why not have a week and kill white people? You understand what I'm saying? In other words, white people, this government and that mayor were well aware of the fact that black people were dying every day in Los Angeles under gang violence. So if you're a gang member and you would normally be killing somebody, why not kill a white person? Do you think that somebody thinks that white people are better, or above dying, when they would kill their own kind? -- Sister Souljah In A Washington Post Interview, 1992

    The white man is not only practicing racism and Zionism and with the prostitution ring, the so-called Jew man with the Jew woman all over the world to make a few dollars. He is also practicing sexism. He's a racist, he's a Zionist, a sexist, and imperialist. He's a no good bastard. He's not a devil, the white man is the Devil -- Khalid Abdul Muhammad, Nation Of Islam & New Black Panther Party,

    (On the Pope) Elijah Muhammad taught that the Pope of Rome is the anti-Christ... It makes me sick to my stomach to see black people running over each other just to kiss this cracker. Who in the hell is the pope of Rome? He's an imposter, he's an idol, he's a false icon that must be torn down. -- Khalid Abdul Muhammad, Nation Of Islam & New Black Panther Party, Appearance at the "Black Holocaust Nationhood Conference," held as a prelude to the Million Man March, October 15, 1995

    White folks was in caves while we was building empires... We taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it. -- Rev. Al Sharpton in a 1994 speech at Kean College


     
  • Comment #86 (Posted by franklin)
    Rating
    I thought you had died. That's what happens when you quit watching the ultra left networks...you begin to miss the racist point of view.
     
  • Comment #87 (Posted by David)
    Rating
    Vote for the canidate, not his/her skin color. Now that's post racial.
     
  • Comment #88 (Posted by Golda Meyer)
    Rating
    It's OK. Malveaux hates women too, if they are not black. You can only have a black Supreme Court Justice if they are uber liberal racists like her. For Malceaux the PRIMARY reason to nominate or elect someone is their skin color. (OOPS Clarence Thomas!)

    "The latest black female scholar to take a stand against Kagan is Bennett College President, Dr. Julianne Malveaux. In a recent article on the topic, Dr. Malveaux raises serious concerns about the Kagan nomination and what this means for African American women. "I was among the many who were disappointed that President Barack Obama did not nominate an African American woman to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court," says Dr. Malveaux. "After all, there are six white men, two women, one Latina and one white, and a nominal African American man on the Court. Why not an African American woman?"
     
  • Comment #89 (Posted by erp)
    Rating
    Field some non-Kool-Aid drinkers in your preferred color. People, not involved in race card politics, vote for the candidate. Unfortunately too many forgot that last presidential election, and voted color. Pretty much all of them have buyer remorse about now.
     
  • Comment #90 (Posted by bflat879)
    Rating
    I have to wonder, if Alan West were running for the Senate, if you'd be so anxious for him to win???
     
  • Comment #91 (Posted by Corey)
    Rating
    Lily white?

    I'm sure Asian-American Senators Inouye and Akaka would love to learn they're white as well as Cuban-American Senator Menendez.

    Yes, senators from Hawaii count.


     
  • Comment #92 (Posted by Al Gore)
    Rating
    According to Julianne Malveaux Climate Change is a civil rights issue.

    She writes: "Climate change is more than an environmental issue. It is a human rights and economic justice issue. Why? Because though climate change impacts all of us, different nations, and different communities within nations, experience the effects of climate change in varying ways, some worse than others."

    Notice how what used to be called "Global Warming" is now "Climate Change" since the weather isn't cooperating with Al Gore and the UN's hoax. They have opted to change the name in an effort to hide the fact their data is cooked, contrived, bogus and dead wrong. Isn't it curious how they claim that CO2 levels are rising but the global temperatures are not rising as predicted? Hmm....how do they get around that? Diversion is how. They start a dialogue about social injustice. Historically it's worked like a charm. They employ influential black people (Margaret Sanger used black ministers) to carry the message (propagandize) to the masses and before you know it Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid cut deals behind closed doors and legislation is pushed through whether the people who are wise to their devices like it or not.

    She continues: "This point was clearly made at last month's U.N. climate change conference in Copenhagen, where it quickly became evident that the rich and powerful nations — particularly the U.S. and members of the European Union — dictate the debate at the expense of poorer countries. That needs to change."


    So according to Ms. Malveaux and the UN poorer countries should be able to force the United States (who will be a poorer country if Obama acheives his goals) to give them our wealth ( I hear a Van Jones loop playing in my head -- "give them the wealth, give them the wealth"). How is this not wealth distribution also known as Socialism? It is wrong according to Ms. Malveaux that the US should dictate the debate. The debate should be dictated by Zimbabwe or Chad or some other 3rd world country apparently via international treaty-- United States sovereignty be damned.

    She also writes: "Robert Bullard, who runs an environmental justice program at Clark Atlanta University, has noted that the adverse impacts of climate change fall most heavily on people of color who are concentrated in urban centers, coastal regions and areas where the air quality is poor."

    What does climate change and pollution (poor air quality) have to do with each other? Oh, silly me how could I have forgotten. According to the Socialist religion known as Global Climate Change the Earth is over-populated which leads to too many people breathing and exhaling the pollutant known as Carbon Dioxide (CO2). So if one were to follow this to it's logical conclusion then we'd understand why abortion is so important and necessary (especially in the black community where 80% of the abortuaries are located). No wonder China has a one child rule -- coming soon to America folks. What about all those old people exhaling CO2? Do you think ObamaCare will go green and give the aged a little "nudge" by informing them of there duty to die in order to improve the air quality and all? It's sounds absurd but following the logical path and our current tract how far-fetched is it really. I'm sure 30 years ago same-sex marriage was absurd. Hey, that fits into the paradigm as well because same sex couples can't procreate little "breathers" who pollute the enviroment.

    This woman is an embarrassment and does not deserve an audience.
     
  • Comment #93 (Posted by Paul A'Barge)
    Rating
    More racial bean counting. Run qualified people who appeal to a majority of the voters in any state and who do not roll in victimhood like a dog in doggy doo-doo and you'll get more black folk elected.
     
  • Comment #94 (Posted by Johnny Mneumonic)
    Rating
    Idiot. What are you, like 5% black? Whatever it is, you're also 100% ugly and 100% racist.
     
  • Comment #95 (Posted by Roy Rogers)
    Rating
    Malveaux quoted as saying at a relief rally in 2006 after Hurricane Katrina displaced thousands, ""What are black folks doing in Utah?"
     
  • Comment #96 (Posted by LL)
    Rating
    Ms. Malveaux draws the conclusion that a vote for someone other than Meek means Florida is somehow racist. not a valid conclusion. Meek is an ineffective candidate, and were he white, I doubt Ms. Malveaux would be writing about the need to elect him. The African American community needs to run solid, American candidates, that have the interests of American at heart, and they can win elections. When their interest is only in African Americans, they will have a hard time winning state wide elections.
     
  • Comment #97 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    It's a fool who creates a wall around themselves and then compains about the walls
     
  • Comment #98 (Posted by ken)
    Rating
    There's a storm brewing; the 2012 election. The further Obama sinks in the polls, the more strident the claims of racism will become. If, as it now seems likely, BHO loses (despite the best efforts of the Dem machine and the NBPP), all hell's gonna break loose. Malveaux's just doing her job, ginning up the troops for the coming "revolution". This time, it WILL be televised. It's a sad, sad day for the USA.
     
  • Comment #99 (Posted by Jed Clampett)
    Rating
    Ohhhhhhhh... those tolerant liberals!

    "A spoiled child (Bush) is telling us our Social Security isn't safe anymore, so he is going to fix it for us. Well, here's your answer, you ungrateful whelp: [audio sound of 4 gunshots being fired.] Just try it, you little b*stard. [audio of gun being cocked]." -- A "humor bit" from the Randi Rhodes Show

    "I want to go up to the closest white person and say: 'You can't understand this, it's a black thing' and then slap him, just for my mental health" -- New York city councilman Charles Barron

    "..And then there's Rumsfeld who said of Iraq 'We have our good days and our bad days.' We should put this S.O.B. up against a wall and say 'This is one of our bad days' and pull the trigger." -- From a fundraising ad put out by the St. Petersburg Democratic Club

    "I believe in ecoterrorism." -- James Cameron

    "...In an ideal world, American consumers could be convinced to do the right thing through an appeal to logic with public service messages like the 'What Would Jesus Drive?' TV campaign, but the kind of people who would buy a car that increases the risk to other motorists in an accident can't be reasoned with. They're selfish and stupid. It's unfortunate that drivers must worry that their SUVs are being targeted by insulting stickers and Molotov cocktails, but one thing's for sure: It couldn't be happening to a more deserving group of people." -- Ted Rall winks at ecoterrorism

    "F*** God D*mned Joe the God D*mned Motherf*cking plumber! I want Motherf*cking Joe the plumber dead." -- Liberal talk show host Charles Karel Bouley on the air.

    "Republicans don't believe in the imagination, partly because so few of them have one, but mostly because it gets in the way of their chosen work, which is to destroy the human race and the planet. Human beings, who have imaginations, can see a recipe for disaster in the making; Republicans, whose goal in life is to profit from disaster and who don't give a hoot about human beings, either can't or won't. Which is why I personally think they should be exterminated before they cause any more harm." -- The Village Voice's Michael Feingold, in a theater review of all places

    (Rush Limbaugh)" just wants the country to fail. To me that's treason. He's not saying anything different than what Osama Bin Laden is saying. You might want to look into this, sir, because I think Rush Limbaugh was the 20th hijacker but he was just so strung out on Oxycontin he missed his flight. ... Rush Limbaugh, I hope the country fails, I hope his kidneys fail, how about that?" -- Wanda Sykes

    "You guys see Live and Let Die, the great Bond film with Yaphet Kotto as the bad guy, Mr. Big? In the end they jam a big CO2 pellet in his face and he blew up. I have to tell you, Rush Limbaugh is looking more and more like Mr. Big, and at some point somebody’s going to jam a CO2 pellet into his head and he’s going to explode like a giant blimp. That day may come. Not yet. But we’ll be there to watch. I think he’s Mr. Big, I think Yaphet Kotto. Are you watching, Rush?" -- Chris Matthews

    "I have zero doubt that if Dick Cheney was not in power, people wouldn't be dying needlessly tomorrow....I'm just saying if he did die, other people, more people would live. That's a fact." -- Bill Maher
     
  • Comment #100 (Posted by joel minton)
    Rating
    You are either ignorant or racist. President pro tempore of the Senate Daniel Inouy?????
     
  • Comment #101 (Posted by PLFlash)
    Rating
    I can't imagine anything further from Dr. Kings dream that the argument that a man must be elected to high office simply because of the color of his skin. Does Ms. Malveaux think we need quotas of Blacks, Whites, Asians, Hispanics, Puerto Ricans, Estonians, Blonde Tahitians,Bald One-Legged Swiss with a Lisp?
     
  • Comment #102 (Posted by Michael)
    Rating
    "Lilly-white"

    Who can think of a phrase <Adjective>-black that wouldn't be met with cries of racism?

    coal-black
    licorice-black
    asphalt-black
    jet-black
    sooty-black
    inky-black







     
  • Comment #103 (Posted by harry taft)
    Rating
    This writer is asserting that the integrity of our political process requires the presence of a person of her race or it is flawed. How incredibly simple some things are for some people. I wonder what her thoughts are about the racial imbalances in several of our professional sports? I'm not complaining about an over representation of African-Americans, as a matter of fact I assume they are the best candidates for their positions. Merit. What does the word mean?
     
  • Comment #104 (Posted by Charlye Cope)
    Rating
    What a RACIST comment! I couldn't finish the article because it was so poorly written and biased. All men/women are genetically the same. Shame on the democrates for creating a RACE issue. It was the "white" hating Dems that started the KKK! P.S. MLK was a REPUBLICAN!! HA! HA!
     
  • Comment #105 (Posted by cloey)
    Rating
    Maybe blacks should run better candidates. Republicans have far better black candidates..smarter, more substance, better issues. It's not racism honey, it's where they stand on the issues.
     
  • Comment #106 (Posted by ML Ortiz)
    Rating
    Marco Rubio is not "white" even in your racist world, he is latino. Or are we hispanics supposed to follow your black and white definitions and subdivide ourselves according to your desire? Are you black or a woman? Would you support barack hussein or hillary rodham on AGENDA or color or sex? Will *you* ever actually be color blind? The amount of flawed logic in this article has MLK rolling in his grave - from his speeches and writings, he wanted MERIT opportunity, not unjust quotas. Latinos don't all vote one way because we THINK for OURSELVES, thus we are R and D and I. After one generation here, we're not X-Americans, we are Americans. The Dems separate everyone, divide and conquer. My friends are sick of racism, most especially my 'black' friends, when people think they got their college slot or their job because of color and not talent; it dimishes their achievements. And everyone else's as well.
     
  • Comment #107 (Posted by Lilly-White Son of Florida)
    Rating
    After the current President, I'd be surprised if a Black is elected to national office again this century.
     
  • Comment #108 (Posted by Jack)
    Rating
    Didn't someone once say that he dreamt of a day when a person would not be judged on the color of his skin, but the content of his character?

    If the Senate or any body is all Euro-Americans or Asian-Americans or any other Hyphenate-Americans, it doesn't follow that it's segregated.

    And members of Congress, regardless of their race, do NOT represent a given race, but ALL the constituents of their districts or states, regardless of color.

    Would a "White Caucus" be considered racist? Then why is the Black Caucus tolerated?
     
  • Comment #109 (Posted by Maninthemiddle)
    Rating
    I understand Julliane, and that is why I expect an article supporting Col. Allen West coming forth as he bids to become the first black Republican congressman since 2003... Otherwise, one might think that racial pandering for Democrats was your mission, and not a color blind society.
     
  • Comment #110 (Posted by ynot4tony2)
    Rating
    This article lost me when it posited this non-sense: "So Crist started drifting slightly to the left of his formerly solid Republican positions..."

    Slightly? SLIGHTLY? He removed the page on his website highlighting his pro-life views. He's made several other veers to the left.

    "Slightly drifting"? This is why mainstream America cannot take the liberal media seriously. Any movement leftward is always trivialized, just like any radical leftist is portrayed as a moderate. However, any movement to the right is, in the media, cause for pants-wetting alarm, and anyone right of center is dismissed as a right-wing extremist.

    Oh, wait. I didn't say anything about color here. Gee...maybe people like me JUST DON'T CARE ABOUT SOMEONE'S COLOR.
     
  • Comment #111 (Posted by Doug)
    Rating
    Wait! Doesn't a person still have to get votes to be elected? Don't people vote for what the candidate stands for?

    "......Meek is not the frontrunner in his primary. Indeed, some say that Meek has garnered insufficient Democratic support and that at the rate the race is going, the state that President Obama won in 2008 may be the site of a Republican victory this year."

    Racist Democrats!!!!!
     
  • Comment #112 (Posted by Joe)
    Rating
    Do you really need to play the race card? UUGGGGHHHH!!!!
     
  • Comment #113 (Posted by Unit34Ahunt)
    Rating
    If you want ethnically apportioned representation why don't you just stop calling it democracy? We could do away with voting and merit entirely when evaluating candidates and just hold up an artist's color chart next to a candidate's face. Color match == It's Millah Time!
     
  • Comment #114 (Posted by Erasmus B Dragin)
    Rating
    Sen. Dan Inouye would probably not call himself a "white" person. Maybe you need to take a step back and stop viewing everything in such artificial black and white lenses.
     
  • Comment #115 (Posted by uncle tom)
    Rating
    as an african american, i am never surprised to read just how racist my own kind can be. pathetic. black black black racism cracker racism black black n-word who cares.
    character integrity hard work is all that matters. but not for this 'sistah'
     
  • Comment #116 (Posted by rogaineguy)
    Rating
    Wouldn't a Rubio win in November undermine the premise of the article? Or would you consider Rubio to be just another member of the "all-white senate?"
     
  • Comment #117 (Posted by Drew)
    Rating
    Hmm. Isn't this sort of racial beancounting exactly what we are supposed to have moved beyond in a post-racial society? Ms. Malveaux suffers from an unfortunate strand of soft-racism, which causes her to think things like only the black candidate can bring "passion to serve the underserved." I wonder if Ms. Malveaux believes that Col. Allen West will bring the same passion to the House of Representatives? I wonder if she has considered the possibility that the "passion" to serve the underserved could actually manifest itself as a desire to free them from the democratic party's plantation-paternalism?
     
  • Comment #118 (Posted by franklin)
    Rating
    I was pretty sure when this racist was elected that the effectivness of the race card would be lost forever. Looks like I was right...people just won't put up with the likes of Ms. Malveaux anymore.
     
  • Comment #119 (Posted by Jeff)
    Rating
    Why exactly does Meek losing an election have ANYTHING to do with race? Perhaps it has to do with his idealogical views that are contradictory to what the majority of America believes. Throw the race card out when it's necessary and quit crying wolf, we know how that story ends.
     
  • Comment #120 (Posted by brad)
    Rating
    last time I checked hispanics were not considered white, moronic race baiter.
     
  • Comment #121 (Posted by x95b10)
    Rating
    *Yawn* More blather from a "Race-Bot". Grow the hell up, Lady.
     
  • Comment #122 (Posted by jim keeling)
    Rating
    this is the problem with America! Lady do your math on population of US and appointed senators.duh!
    Get over the calling out of "sombody is doing somebody wrong. Either you are an American or not. No Black Americans, No White Americans, No Brown Americans,,,,,,,,,,just Americans! This is the division that Dr. King was sick of in American. The voice of the people elect..not free passes to Go!
     
  • Comment #123 (Posted by Abdul Kareema Wheat)
    Rating
    It looks like the racist "doctor" Malveaux sure had her a$$ handed to her today! This racism crap is as old as an anti bellum plantation...bunk!
     
  • Comment #124 (Posted by Dolly)
    Rating
    so much for "the content of their character over the color of their skin," I guess. To this writer the color of the skin appears to mean everything. Who are the racists, again?
     
  • Comment #125 (Posted by whoframedrudy)
    Rating
    The author of this piece suffers from race psychosis. In recent American history, blacks have held positions of Attorney General, Secretary of State, National Security Advisor, Chairman Joint Chiefs, Supreme Court Justice, RNC Chairman, Governor of NY, Mayor of New York, House Whip, Chairman House Ways & Means, oh, and President. Like I said, this author is a paranoid race psychotic. And, sadly, her psychosis is contagious to too many other blacks.
     
Submit Comment